Patent #08 · Patent PendingFiled September 8, 2026

UEFI Resident Motion Detection

Firmware-Resident Security Module for Pre-Boot Execution Environment Monitoring and Non-Volatile State Interception · Patent Pending

A firmware-resident UEFI DXE driver establishes a cryptographic baseline of firmware state before the OS loads. When a monitored firmware configuration structure deviates from baseline, the module intercepts the event vector and executes an autonomous containment protocol entirely within the firmware layer — boot abort or TPM forensic write — before any subsequent boot phase executes.

How Patent #08 works

PHASE 1 — DXE Baseline Establishment (before OS loads)
Interrogates CPU and platform architecture registers directly
Measures SMI timing durations and execution frequencies
Compiles physical machine states into firmware-resident baseline map
Cached in protected volatile firmware memory — inaccessible to OS
PHASE 2 — Active Interception (continuous during DXE)
Monitors for event vectors attempting modifications to firmware configuration structures
Calculates delta between proposed state change and trusted baseline map
PHASE 3 — Autonomous Containment (if threshold exceeded)
Executes containment protocol — aborts boot sequence
Commits cryptographically signed forensic voucher to hardware TPM
All before any subsequent boot phase executes

Firmware-native

Executes entirely within the UEFI DXE phase. No operating system. No network stack. No kernel. Response fires before any OS code runs.

Autonomous containment

No cloud round-trip. No OS-layer agent required. Containment is embedded in the firmware module and fires directly on threshold breach.

TPM forensic seal

Cryptographically signed forensic voucher committed to hardware TPM registers before any subsequent boot phase, preserving tamper-evident evidence.

Patent #08 vs Patent #10 — two distinct patents confirmed

VectorPatent #08 (UEFI Resident Motion Detection)Patent #10 (UEFI Resident Module™)
Response locationFirmware layer only — never reaches OSCross-layer — firmware to OS agent
Response actionBoot abort + TPM forensic writeUEFI variable → Rust agent → PQC audit chain
OS requiredNo — response fires pre-OSYes — OS agent seals the evidence
Evidence destinationHardware TPM registersPost-quantum signed audit ledger
SMM moduleNot requiredRequired — SMI frequency monitoring
Attorney filingSeparate patent applicationSeparate patent application

What Patent #08 monitors

The firmware-resident security module monitors three categories of firmware configuration structures during the pre-boot phase.

    1.
    UEFI runtime variable namespace
    Volatile and non-volatile UEFI NVRAM. Firmware implants write persistence data here to survive reboots. Any unauthorized write to a monitored namespace triggers interception.
    2.
    ACPI system description tables
    Unmapped regions of DSDT, SSDT, and MADT. Firmware implants modify ACPI tables to inject execution paths or persistence mechanisms. Table hash deviation triggers interception.
    3.
    SMM code execution vectors
    System Management Mode execution redirect targets. Hijacking SMM vectors allows firmware implants to execute at the highest CPU privilege level. Vector redirect attempts trigger interception.

What Patent #08 covers

  • UEFI DXE driver initializing in pre-operating system boot phase
  • Hardware interrogation routine extracting physical machine states
  • SMI timing baseline from high-resolution firmware timer loop
  • Firmware-resident baseline map in protected volatile memory
  • Event vector interception for firmware configuration modification attempts
  • Threshold-based delta calculation against trusted baseline
  • Autonomous boot abort on threshold breach
  • Cryptographically signed forensic voucher to hardware TPM
  • All containment executed before any subsequent boot phase
  • Three monitored channel types: UEFI vars, ACPI tables, SMM vectors

Patent Pending. Priority date September 8, 2026. © 2026 Darrell Rhodes d/b/a MDRwatchdog. See published claims page for full independent and dependent claim language.

DXE
Execution environment
Pre-OS
Response fires before OS
TPM
Evidence destination
0
OS required for containment

Common questions

What does Patent #08 cover?+

Patent #08 covers a firmware-resident UEFI DXE driver that establishes a cryptographic baseline map of firmware state during the pre-boot phase — before the operating system loads. The baseline captures physical machine states directly from CPU and platform architecture registers, SMI timing durations, and execution frequencies. When a monitored firmware configuration structure deviates from baseline, the module intercepts the event vector and executes an autonomous containment protocol entirely within the firmware layer, without requiring the operating system.

How is Patent #08 different from Patent #10 (UEFI Resident Module™)?+

The distinction is in the response architecture. Patent #08 covers firmware-resident containment — the response stays inside the firmware layer. Detection triggers a boot abort or a TPM forensic write, all before the OS bootloader executes. Patent #10 covers cross-layer detection communication — the DXE driver and SMM handler detect anomalies and communicate them via a named UEFI runtime variable to an OS-layer Rust agent, which seals the evidence to the PQC audit chain. Two different response approaches from the same detection layer. The attorney has confirmed these are two separate patent filings.

Why does containment inside the firmware layer matter?+

When a firmware implant is detected, two response paths are possible. The first is to communicate the detection upward to the OS layer for logging and response — Patent #10 covers this. The second is to abort the boot sequence immediately within the firmware layer, before the OS loads and potentially before a sophisticated implant can take further action. Patent #08 covers this second path. The response never reaches the OS, the implant cannot observe or interfere with the containment action, and the forensic evidence is committed to the TPM before any subsequent boot phase executes.

What is the relationship between the DXE baseline and the interception mechanism?+

The DXE baseline is established first — before any OS code runs, the module interrogates hardware registers, measures SMI timing, and compiles a firmware-resident baseline map cached in protected volatile memory. The interception mechanism then monitors for deviations: any event vector attempting to modify a monitored firmware configuration structure is caught, its proposed state change is calculated against the baseline, and if the deviation exceeds the threshold, the containment protocol fires.

What firmware configuration structures does Patent #08 monitor?+

The monitored structures include volatile and non-volatile UEFI runtime variable namespaces, unmapped regions of ACPI system description tables (DSDT, SSDT, MADT), and System Management Mode code execution vector redirect targets. These are the specific structures that firmware implants modify to establish persistence or extend their control over the boot process.

What is the priority date for Patent #08?+

The priority date is September 8, 2026, established by public disclosure of the claim language on the MDRwatchdog published claims page, corroborated by the PQC-sealed MDRwatchdog audit ledger (Block #1, 24,432 records, sealed September 7, 2026) and timestamped GitHub commits.

Related patents

Plain-language answers to the questions buyers ask most — readiness and evidence, not certification or legal advice.

Two-path firmware defense.

Patent #08 fires containment inside the firmware layer. Patent #10 communicates evidence to the OS-layer audit chain. Together they cover both response architectures. Book a 15-minute review.

Schedule your 15-minute review