UEFI Resident Motion Detection
Firmware-Resident Security Module for Pre-Boot Execution Environment Monitoring and Non-Volatile State Interception · Patent Pending
A firmware-resident UEFI DXE driver establishes a cryptographic baseline of firmware state before the OS loads. When a monitored firmware configuration structure deviates from baseline, the module intercepts the event vector and executes an autonomous containment protocol entirely within the firmware layer — boot abort or TPM forensic write — before any subsequent boot phase executes.
How Patent #08 works
Firmware-native
Executes entirely within the UEFI DXE phase. No operating system. No network stack. No kernel. Response fires before any OS code runs.
Autonomous containment
No cloud round-trip. No OS-layer agent required. Containment is embedded in the firmware module and fires directly on threshold breach.
TPM forensic seal
Cryptographically signed forensic voucher committed to hardware TPM registers before any subsequent boot phase, preserving tamper-evident evidence.
Patent #08 vs Patent #10 — two distinct patents confirmed
| Vector | Patent #08 (UEFI Resident Motion Detection) | Patent #10 (UEFI Resident Module™) |
|---|---|---|
| Response location | Firmware layer only — never reaches OS | Cross-layer — firmware to OS agent |
| Response action | Boot abort + TPM forensic write | UEFI variable → Rust agent → PQC audit chain |
| OS required | No — response fires pre-OS | Yes — OS agent seals the evidence |
| Evidence destination | Hardware TPM registers | Post-quantum signed audit ledger |
| SMM module | Not required | Required — SMI frequency monitoring |
| Attorney filing | Separate patent application | Separate patent application |
What Patent #08 monitors
The firmware-resident security module monitors three categories of firmware configuration structures during the pre-boot phase.
What Patent #08 covers
- UEFI DXE driver initializing in pre-operating system boot phase
- Hardware interrogation routine extracting physical machine states
- SMI timing baseline from high-resolution firmware timer loop
- Firmware-resident baseline map in protected volatile memory
- Event vector interception for firmware configuration modification attempts
- Threshold-based delta calculation against trusted baseline
- Autonomous boot abort on threshold breach
- Cryptographically signed forensic voucher to hardware TPM
- All containment executed before any subsequent boot phase
- Three monitored channel types: UEFI vars, ACPI tables, SMM vectors
Patent Pending. Priority date September 8, 2026. © 2026 Darrell Rhodes d/b/a MDRwatchdog. See published claims page for full independent and dependent claim language.
Common questions
What does Patent #08 cover?+
Patent #08 covers a firmware-resident UEFI DXE driver that establishes a cryptographic baseline map of firmware state during the pre-boot phase — before the operating system loads. The baseline captures physical machine states directly from CPU and platform architecture registers, SMI timing durations, and execution frequencies. When a monitored firmware configuration structure deviates from baseline, the module intercepts the event vector and executes an autonomous containment protocol entirely within the firmware layer, without requiring the operating system.
How is Patent #08 different from Patent #10 (UEFI Resident Module™)?+
The distinction is in the response architecture. Patent #08 covers firmware-resident containment — the response stays inside the firmware layer. Detection triggers a boot abort or a TPM forensic write, all before the OS bootloader executes. Patent #10 covers cross-layer detection communication — the DXE driver and SMM handler detect anomalies and communicate them via a named UEFI runtime variable to an OS-layer Rust agent, which seals the evidence to the PQC audit chain. Two different response approaches from the same detection layer. The attorney has confirmed these are two separate patent filings.
Why does containment inside the firmware layer matter?+
When a firmware implant is detected, two response paths are possible. The first is to communicate the detection upward to the OS layer for logging and response — Patent #10 covers this. The second is to abort the boot sequence immediately within the firmware layer, before the OS loads and potentially before a sophisticated implant can take further action. Patent #08 covers this second path. The response never reaches the OS, the implant cannot observe or interfere with the containment action, and the forensic evidence is committed to the TPM before any subsequent boot phase executes.
What is the relationship between the DXE baseline and the interception mechanism?+
The DXE baseline is established first — before any OS code runs, the module interrogates hardware registers, measures SMI timing, and compiles a firmware-resident baseline map cached in protected volatile memory. The interception mechanism then monitors for deviations: any event vector attempting to modify a monitored firmware configuration structure is caught, its proposed state change is calculated against the baseline, and if the deviation exceeds the threshold, the containment protocol fires.
What firmware configuration structures does Patent #08 monitor?+
The monitored structures include volatile and non-volatile UEFI runtime variable namespaces, unmapped regions of ACPI system description tables (DSDT, SSDT, MADT), and System Management Mode code execution vector redirect targets. These are the specific structures that firmware implants modify to establish persistence or extend their control over the boot process.
What is the priority date for Patent #08?+
The priority date is September 8, 2026, established by public disclosure of the claim language on the MDRwatchdog published claims page, corroborated by the PQC-sealed MDRwatchdog audit ledger (Block #1, 24,432 records, sealed September 7, 2026) and timestamped GitHub commits.
Related patents
Plain-language answers to the questions buyers ask most — readiness and evidence, not certification or legal advice.
Two-path firmware defense.
Patent #08 fires containment inside the firmware layer. Patent #10 communicates evidence to the OS-layer audit chain. Together they cover both response architectures. Book a 15-minute review.
Schedule your 15-minute review