As states adopt the NAIC data-security law, insurers inherit specific program obligations. We monitor continuously and produce the logging and program evidence the law expects—plus a posture signal for your own carrier.
Book a 15-minute review →Insurers and producers face the NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law in adopting states, often alongside NYDFS 500 and SOC 2. The recurring challenge is demonstrating persistent monitoring and a documented program over time.
MDRwatchdog maps continuous monitoring to the model law's requirements, retains a tamper-evident audit trail, and produces a program assessment and gap report. The same posture doubles as an underwriting signal at your own renewal.
Adoption varies by state and compliance is determined by your organization and regulator; we provide evidence, not certification or legal advice.
For insurers and producers, the most relevant frameworks are NAIC Model #668, NYDFS 500, SOC 2. Which apply to you depends on your contracts, data, and clients.
Insurance face meeting the NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law in adopting states. Continuous monitoring both detects threats and produces the ongoing evidence that compliance frameworks and client security reviews increasingly require.
Yes. One monitored environment feeds every applicable framework, so a second framework is far more efficient than the first - the underlying evidence is shared.
MDRwatchdog provides security monitoring and compliance evidence to support readiness. It is not a certification and not legal advice. Certification and formal audits are performed by the appropriate authorized bodies (a C3PAO for CMMC, a licensed CPA firm for SOC 2, an accredited body for ISO 27001).