Regulators and examiners expect a documented, operating security program. We monitor continuously and produce evidence across NYDFS 500, SOC 2, and the FTC Safeguards Rule—so examinations rest on proof.
Book a 15-minute review →Financial-services firms protect nonpublic information under a stack of overlapping regimes—NYDFS 23 NYCRR 500 for New York-regulated entities, the FTC Safeguards Rule under GLBA, and SOC 2 or ISO 27001 for client assurance. Examiners want evidence that controls operated, not just that policies exist.
MDRwatchdog maps continuous monitoring to each applicable framework, retains a tamper-evident audit trail, and produces section-by-section evidence and gap reports. One monitored environment feeds every framework you're subject to.
Compliance and certification are determined by the appropriate bodies; MDRwatchdog supplies monitoring and evidence, and nothing here is legal advice.
For financial-services firms, the most relevant frameworks are NYDFS 500, SOC 2, FTC Safeguards Rule, ISO 27001. Which apply to you depends on your contracts, data, and clients.
Financial Services face protecting nonpublic information (NPI) and meeting examiner expectations. Continuous monitoring both detects threats and produces the ongoing evidence that compliance frameworks and client security reviews increasingly require.
Yes. One monitored environment feeds every applicable framework, so a second framework is far more efficient than the first - the underlying evidence is shared.
MDRwatchdog provides security monitoring and compliance evidence to support readiness. It is not a certification and not legal advice. Certification and formal audits are performed by the appropriate authorized bodies (a C3PAO for CMMC, a licensed CPA firm for SOC 2, an accredited body for ISO 27001).